The best thing to do is go to the Michigan Courts website here which has all you need to know about expungement in Michigan. It includes what criteria you must meet as well as relevant forms that will need to be filled out to apply.
How Do You Get An Expungement In Michigan?
DUI THIRD vs. 2ND AMENDMENT GUN RIGHT:
VICTIMLESS CRIME & VOID OF INJURED PARTY
Current law Eternally Removes the “Right to keep and bear arms” based on a drinking and driving record of 3 DUI convictions when the Crime is victimless & Void of any injured party. (Cannot be restored)
INDIVIDUAL STATE LAWS
The states impose the felony laws for DUI 3rd, 4th, or even 5th offenses (Depending on state) however, it is the Federal Law of Title 18 922 that eternally cements and debars the individuals right to possess a firearm regardless if the firearm is for hunting, self-defense or for personal protection. (The federal government has enslaved the people for non-violent offenses)
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." - Thomas Jefferson
THE TRUTH
Regardless the number of DUI convictions, driving under the influence of alcohol has absolutely NO relationship with the second amendment protected “Right” of the people to keep and bear arms if there is no injured party.
The states “Including Michigan” contend that a person’s driving record of 3 DUI convictions poses a serious risk to society and should establish a “Felony” on there record that by federal nexus of Title 18 922 inherently & eternally removes the citizens “Right” to keep and bear arms for as long as that person shall live upon the face of this earth.
Shouldn’t the states and the federal government first eternally remove the drivers “Privilege” (A Non Protected Right) of operating a motor vehicle before eternally removing a “Protected Right” of the people to posses a firearm?
(Which removal would tend to actually save lives?)
Currently the states reinstate the citizens “Privilege” of operating a motor vehicle yet federal Title 18 922 (Felony Laws) eternally & forever block the citizens “RIGHT” from ever possessing a firearm for THE EXACT SAME DRINKING & DRIVING OFFENSE of DUI 3rd CONVICTIONS: DOES THIS MAKE SENSE?
Drunk drivers “KILL” thousands of motorists each year: Debarring the drunk drivers second amendment” Right” to keep and bear arms has not saved even one motorist or life, ever!
In Fact, Debarring the persons “Privilege” to ever operate a motor vehicle WOULD SAVE countless lives and WOULD NOT infringe upon the Constitutionally Protected God given inalienable “Right” of the people to bear arms!
THE ROOT AND PROBLEM vs. PRIVILEGE AND RIGHT:
The state “Privilege” of operating a motor vehicle is a mere “Privilege,” “and is NOT A RIGHT”: For DUI 3rd convictions the” Privilege” of driving has a time frame provision by the state for “Absolute & Full Reinstatement” to operate a motor vehicle on public roads.
The “Right” to Keep and Bear Arms, “IS A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT” and “is NOT just simply a mere Privilege”:
For DUI 3rd convictions this “RIGHT” to keep and bear arms is eternally and forever debarred void of time frame provision for reinstatement based on the federal law of Title 18 922. (THE STATES NEED TO ALLOW TIME FRAME REINSTATEMENT FOR DUI 3RD OFFENSES BY REMOVING THE FELONY)
Regardless of one’s personal & moral stand on drinking and driving, there should be a positive reinstatement provision for constitutional “Rights” of the people to keep and bear arms THE SAME as there is a TIME FRAME provision for reinstatement of a mere “Privilege for the EXACT SAME drinking & driving offense of DUI 3rd convictions especially when there is no injured party.
THE OPERATORS STATE “PRIVILEGE” TO OPERATE A MOTOR VEHICLE IS TIME FRAME REINSTATED: THE DRIVERS RIGHT TO POSESS A FIREARM SHOULD ALSO HAVE THIS EXACT SAME TIME FRAME FOR REINSTATMENT OF THEIR RIGHT, BASED ON THE EXACT SAME OFFENSE.
PLEASE CONTACT YOUR STATE SENATORS AND REPRESENTATIVES FOR TIME FRAME REINSTATEMENT
VICTIMLESS CRIME & VOID OF INJURED PARTY
Current law Eternally Removes the “Right to keep and bear arms” based on a drinking and driving record of 3 DUI convictions when the Crime is victimless & Void of any injured party. (Cannot be restored)
INDIVIDUAL STATE LAWS
The states impose the felony laws for DUI 3rd, 4th, or even 5th offenses (Depending on state) however, it is the Federal Law of Title 18 922 that eternally cements and debars the individuals right to possess a firearm regardless if the firearm is for hunting, self-defense or for personal protection. (The federal government has enslaved the people for non-violent offenses)
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." - Thomas Jefferson
THE TRUTH
Regardless the number of DUI convictions, driving under the influence of alcohol has absolutely NO relationship with the second amendment protected “Right” of the people to keep and bear arms if there is no injured party.
The states “Including Michigan” contend that a person’s driving record of 3 DUI convictions poses a serious risk to society and should establish a “Felony” on there record that by federal nexus of Title 18 922 inherently & eternally removes the citizens “Right” to keep and bear arms for as long as that person shall live upon the face of this earth.
Shouldn’t the states and the federal government first eternally remove the drivers “Privilege” (A Non Protected Right) of operating a motor vehicle before eternally removing a “Protected Right” of the people to posses a firearm?
(Which removal would tend to actually save lives?)
Currently the states reinstate the citizens “Privilege” of operating a motor vehicle yet federal Title 18 922 (Felony Laws) eternally & forever block the citizens “RIGHT” from ever possessing a firearm for THE EXACT SAME DRINKING & DRIVING OFFENSE of DUI 3rd CONVICTIONS: DOES THIS MAKE SENSE?
Drunk drivers “KILL” thousands of motorists each year: Debarring the drunk drivers second amendment” Right” to keep and bear arms has not saved even one motorist or life, ever!
In Fact, Debarring the persons “Privilege” to ever operate a motor vehicle WOULD SAVE countless lives and WOULD NOT infringe upon the Constitutionally Protected God given inalienable “Right” of the people to bear arms!
THE ROOT AND PROBLEM vs. PRIVILEGE AND RIGHT:
The state “Privilege” of operating a motor vehicle is a mere “Privilege,” “and is NOT A RIGHT”: For DUI 3rd convictions the” Privilege” of driving has a time frame provision by the state for “Absolute & Full Reinstatement” to operate a motor vehicle on public roads.
The “Right” to Keep and Bear Arms, “IS A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT” and “is NOT just simply a mere Privilege”:
For DUI 3rd convictions this “RIGHT” to keep and bear arms is eternally and forever debarred void of time frame provision for reinstatement based on the federal law of Title 18 922. (THE STATES NEED TO ALLOW TIME FRAME REINSTATEMENT FOR DUI 3RD OFFENSES BY REMOVING THE FELONY)
Regardless of one’s personal & moral stand on drinking and driving, there should be a positive reinstatement provision for constitutional “Rights” of the people to keep and bear arms THE SAME as there is a TIME FRAME provision for reinstatement of a mere “Privilege for the EXACT SAME drinking & driving offense of DUI 3rd convictions especially when there is no injured party.
THE OPERATORS STATE “PRIVILEGE” TO OPERATE A MOTOR VEHICLE IS TIME FRAME REINSTATED: THE DRIVERS RIGHT TO POSESS A FIREARM SHOULD ALSO HAVE THIS EXACT SAME TIME FRAME FOR REINSTATMENT OF THEIR RIGHT, BASED ON THE EXACT SAME OFFENSE.
PLEASE CONTACT YOUR STATE SENATORS AND REPRESENTATIVES FOR TIME FRAME REINSTATEMENT
RE: DUI CONVICTIONS vs. 2ND AMENDMENT GUN RIGHT
Is the guaranteed second amendment Right really a Right when the government eternally Debarred the right to keep and bear arms based on one’s drinking and driving record of 3 DUI convictions?
IMPORTANT PLEASE READ
How come law makers choose to Debar the second amendment Right to drunk drivers, rather than another Right, such as free speech, religion, or to be secure in their homes, or better yet the Privilege of driving?
Driving under the influence of alcohol has no relationship with the second amendment Right of the people to keep and bear arms regardless the number of DUI convictions.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." - Thomas Jefferson
The government contends that a person’s driving record of 3 DUI convictions poses a risk factor to society and should thereby have their Right to keep and bear arms eternally Debarred.
Shouldn't’t the government Debar the drunk drivers Privilege to drive? (The root cause of the issue)
Drunk drivers kill thousands of motorists each year: Debarring the drunk drivers “Right” to keep and bear arms has not saved even one motorist or life.
However, Debarring the “Privilege” to drive will save countless lives and will not infringe upon the God given “Rights” of any free man!
THE ROOT AND PROBLEM vs. THE PRIVILEGE AND THE RIGHT
The driving “Privilege” is a “Privilege,” “IS NOT A RIGHT”:
For convictions of 3rd DUI the driving “Privilege” is revoked for up to 5 years with time frame provision for full reinstatement of driving Privilege.
The “Right” to Keep and Bear Arms, “IS A Right” and “is not a Privilege”:
Yet, for convictions of 3rd DUI, this “RIGHT” to keep and bear arms is currently eternally Debarred void of time frame provision for reinstatement. The Right is forever and eternally lost.
Regardless of one’s stand on drinking and driving, there should be a reinstatement provision for the “Right” to keep and bear arms as there is provision for a “Privilege” the Privilege of driving.
If this usurpation of Right is not overruled, there needs to be a remedy and time frame for reinstatement of the Right since the initial core threat of drinking and driving has no relevance to keeping and bearing arms …
Is the guaranteed second amendment Right really a Right when the government eternally Debarred the right to keep and bear arms based on one’s drinking and driving record of 3 DUI convictions?
IMPORTANT PLEASE READ
How come law makers choose to Debar the second amendment Right to drunk drivers, rather than another Right, such as free speech, religion, or to be secure in their homes, or better yet the Privilege of driving?
Driving under the influence of alcohol has no relationship with the second amendment Right of the people to keep and bear arms regardless the number of DUI convictions.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." - Thomas Jefferson
The government contends that a person’s driving record of 3 DUI convictions poses a risk factor to society and should thereby have their Right to keep and bear arms eternally Debarred.
Shouldn't’t the government Debar the drunk drivers Privilege to drive? (The root cause of the issue)
Drunk drivers kill thousands of motorists each year: Debarring the drunk drivers “Right” to keep and bear arms has not saved even one motorist or life.
However, Debarring the “Privilege” to drive will save countless lives and will not infringe upon the God given “Rights” of any free man!
THE ROOT AND PROBLEM vs. THE PRIVILEGE AND THE RIGHT
The driving “Privilege” is a “Privilege,” “IS NOT A RIGHT”:
For convictions of 3rd DUI the driving “Privilege” is revoked for up to 5 years with time frame provision for full reinstatement of driving Privilege.
The “Right” to Keep and Bear Arms, “IS A Right” and “is not a Privilege”:
Yet, for convictions of 3rd DUI, this “RIGHT” to keep and bear arms is currently eternally Debarred void of time frame provision for reinstatement. The Right is forever and eternally lost.
Regardless of one’s stand on drinking and driving, there should be a reinstatement provision for the “Right” to keep and bear arms as there is provision for a “Privilege” the Privilege of driving.
If this usurpation of Right is not overruled, there needs to be a remedy and time frame for reinstatement of the Right since the initial core threat of drinking and driving has no relevance to keeping and bearing arms …
Can an assault and battery record be expunged? It's for being able to buy a hunting rifle. I am in the military now also, could that help any? Please no opinions, just straight forward fact or somewhere to lead me in the right direction. Thanks.